Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lynn Max Kempen vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kempen vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Lynn Max Kempen vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kempen 1 - 0 Zima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kempen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zima has won 42.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kempen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 45.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kempen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 53.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kempen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zima winning 52.94% (W/L 27/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kempen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 35/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 61/ 58).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kempen winning 1 times and Zima being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kempen winning 2 and Zima winning 1. The last match between Kempen and Zima was at the M15 Ueberlingen, 21-08-2019, First, Clay with Lynn Max Kempen getting the victory 7-6(3) 2-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:42:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kempen and Zima have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kempen winning 1 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kempen winning 1, and Zima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kempen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 129.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kempen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kempen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 39.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
51% (38-37)
Career Total W/L
56% (158-126)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
62% (18-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lynn Max Kempen | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:42:0 | 2:42:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 81% (84/104) | 70% (69/98) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (49/84) | 68% (47/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 80% (16/20) | 55% (16/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (35/98) | 38% (39/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 2-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Lynn Max Kempen
Player
Leopold Zima
81%
(
84 of
104)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
98)
0
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lynn Max Kempen | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (18/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (38/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (334/315) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 105.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (663/986) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (460/663) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (136/323) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (28/71) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 34% (313/924) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (18/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (18/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 23% (13/3) |
Lynn Max Kempen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Lynn Max Kempen
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lynn Max Kempen
Player
Paul-Georg Guenther
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 2-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Romano
Player
Leopold Zima
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Milos Karol
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kempen Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kempen are available here and Zima photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Leopold Zima
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
